தமிழ்த் தேசியம்

"To us all towns are one, all men our kin.
Life's good comes not from others' gift, nor ill
Man's pains and pains' relief are from within.
Thus have we seen in visions of the wise !."

- Tamil Poem in Purananuru, circa 500 B.C 

Home

 Whats New

Trans State Nation Tamil Eelam Beyond Tamil Nation Comments Search

Home > Tamil Diaspora - a Trans State Nation > Pongu Thamizh  > Australia > Bahrain  > Botswana > Canada  > Denmark > Eelam  > Fiji > Finland > France > Germany > Guadelope & Martinique > Indonesia > Italy Karnataka > Malaysia > Mauritius > Myanmar > Netherlands  > New Caledonia & Tahiti > New Zealand > Norway > Quatar > Reunion  > Seychelles > Singapore > South Africa   >  SwedenSwitzerland >Tamil Nadu >Trinidad   > United KingdomUSA > International Frame of  the Tamil Struggle > Struggle for Tamil Eelam

Tamils - a Trans State Nation

CONTENTS
OF THIS SECTION

Last updated
30/08/07

New Zealand MP, HR activists address fasting Tamils, 29 May 2006
Consortium of Tamil Associations, New Zealand Media Release on Killing of Civilians in Tamil Eelam, 16 June 2006

Significance of Land, Language and Culture
in a Multicultural Society, 17 February 2002

Tamils in New Zealand - An International Conference University of Wellington - 13 July 1996

Tamil Media New Zealand "Tamil Media New Zealand was founded on the 11th.July’2002 as a Charitable Trust Inc.in NewZealand. It was established as a non-profit entity with active participation from the Tamil Community. Tamil Media NewZealand involves in variety of activities to cater the needs of the community, which includes the active promotion of our ancient heritage, the rich language and the cultural traditions of the Tamil people.

Tamil Media NewZealand incorporates the Tamil Radio “Thaemadura Thamil Osai” which operates on 104.6 FM on every Tuesday at 9.20pm to 10.20pm.

“Thaemadura Thamil Osai” was originally founded on 1st.January’1999 and successfully established as the premier Tamil Radio in NewZealand. It continues to maintain its efforts to promote the vibrant Tamil Culture and the Tamil Language."
Canterbury Tamil Society

Bharathy(S)'s Ambalam - C.Kumarabharathy

Tamil Human Rights Page in New Zealand
Wellington Tamil Society
Tamil Page at New Zealand
Tamil Language - Ilanko

Sigaram Tamil Vision Network
 - Australia & New Zealand

New Zealand Tamils

 

New Zealand - நியூசிலாந்து
- an estimated 3000 Tamils live in New Zealand -


 "Tamils have long been seafarers and traders. It is believed that they reached northern Australia by the 14th century, and there is a suggestion that they may have got as far as New Zealand. In 1836 the missionary explorer William Colenso found this bell, which had been used by Māori as a cooking vessel for generations. Inscribed on it in Tamil are the words ‘Mohoyideen Buk’s ship’s bell’. The bell is now held at the national museum, Te Papa. Theories abound, but the precise origins of the bell and how it got to New Zealand remain a mystery." The Tamil Bell

" Around 1836, the missionary William Colenso met Māori near Whangarei using the bell as a kohua (iron pot) to cook potatoes. It is bronze, thirteen centimetres long and nine centimetres deep, and has an inscription. Colenso was told that the bell had been found after a heavy gale had blown down a large tree; it was uncovered from the tree roots. Its owners believed that the bell had been in the possession of the iwi (tribe) for several generations. Colenso swapped an iron pot for the bell. After his death he bequeathed the bell to the Colonial Museum, forbear to Te Papa Tongarewa.

The bell produced a lot of interest when it was exhibited, and discussions and theories abounded about its origins. The bell was photographed and copies sent to England and various people in India. Tamils in Southern India immediately recognised the writing on the bell. The bell has been identified as a type of ship's bell. Some of the characters in the inscription are of an archaic form no longer seen in modern Tamil script; thus suggesting that the bell could be about 500 years old."
Museum of New Zealand


Significance of Land, Language and Culture
in a Multicultural Society - Symposium

Mt. Albert War Memorial Hall, Auckland, New Zealand
17 February 2002

A symposium on ‘The Significance of Land, Language and Culture in a Multicultural Society’ was held on Sunday, February 17th from 3.00 p.m. at Mt. Albert War Memorial Hall in Auckland. The symposium was organized to discuss the above topic with special reference to the Tamil people’s struggle in Sri Lanka and also to focus on the anti-terrorism bill in front of the Select Committee in New Zealand. Members of parliament, Matt Robson (Alliance), Keith Locke (Green), Marie Hasler (National), and Chris Carter (Labour) as well as Adhitya Kashiyap of United Future presented the views of their respective parties.

Prof. Margaret Trawick, anthropologist, with expertise on the Tamil people’s struggle for self-determination also spoke. Robert Newson of the Human rights Commission, who is a Maori, also spoke on the Maori perspective to land, language and culture.

The first speaker was Robert Newson. He spoke of two aspects in relation to the topic. Tangata whenua. Tangata is people, the tribe. Whenua is land. He spoke of his home being the place where he comes from and not where he currently lives. The land owns him, and he does not own the land. He said his struggle today may not be the same as that of the Tamil people but it has been in the past. Many understand mana to mean power. He interprets mana as deriving from manaki - to care and share. You give me mana because ‘I care for you’. If there is no land then where can one care for others. In the absence of land therefore there is no mana. He said it is his duty as tangata whenua to welcome all to Aotearoa. But he has not been given that chance. He asked how he could share the land with all if he does not have Tino Rangatiratanga, self-determination.

Prof. Trawick spoke next about the Tamil people’s struggle and the current peace process. She started by saying that like Maori and many other indigenous people land, language and culture are inseparable for the Tamil people. In the case of Eelam Tamils she said they suffered persecution at the hands of another indigenous people, the Sinhala people. She added that this persecution was not due to self-motivated acts of individuals but rather by a corrupt ruling class that controlled the government. On the question of how New Zealand can help she listed the following. New Zealand should remain neutral. New Zealand could offer itself as a neutral venue for peace talks. There could be fact-finding missions to the newly opened war zones in Sri Lanka, either as individuals or as government sponsored delegation. This is very important she added. Also of value will be concrete assistance in rehabilitation. Although New Zealand cannot do much, by starting a small rehabilitation project in the war zone it could set an example for other countries to follow she said.

Minister Matt Robson spoke next. Minister’s explanation of the anti-terrorism bill was most helpful. He started by saying that the New Zealand government recognises the gross human rights violations against Tamil people in Sri Lanka and that New Zealand recognises the conflict within the context of struggle as recognised by the United Nations, that the people have an inalienable right to their language and the right to live freely without persecution in the land that they live. This he said sadly has not been the case in Sri Lanka. He then spoke of the peace process and New Zealand’s support for Norway’s effort. New Zealand has played a role in the pacific in conflict reduction but he said it is difficult to do the same around the world. New Zealand however, remains open to other roles in the Sri Lankan peace process, he added. On the topic of the anti-terrorism bill he explained the difficulties of defining who is a ‘terrorist’. He acknowledged that it was wrong to rush amendments to the anti-terrorism bill because of the events on September 11th. He said the contentious area is deciding who is to be proscribed as terrorist. There is a lot of discussion going on in narrowing down the definition.

Keith Locke, member for Green party, in his speech criticised the anti-terrorism bill and said that it paves the way for a future government to act in bad judgement. He said that the bill places sole responsibility for deciding who is a ‘terrorist’ on the Prime Minister, assisted by one other minister. In his view this can lead to a dictatorship, he said. He said in national struggles atrocities are committed by both sides. But when it comes to proscribing, the USA has always proscribed the liberation movements and not the States involved. This he said is a biased act that is not peace making but rather war making. He added that New Zealand should use the model it used for Bougainville where it treated both parties as equals and invited them to New Zealand to hold talks. He also added even if this government does not proscribe LTTE, the bill instills fear in the minds of Tamils here. It will also lead to prejudices as seen in the recent coverage of the New Zealand Tamil’s support for LTTE in the Herald newspaper.

Chris Carter, a Labour party member of parliament thanked the Tamil community for their energy and hard work in New Zealand. He noted how 50 years ago Sri Lanka was held up as a model country ready for independence and how tragically it has failed to live up to that promise. He expressed hopes that the peace process will end the tragedy. He added that New Zealand rejects terrorism but those who supported the struggle in a peaceful way will not be criminalised he said.

Marie Hasler, member for National party spoke next. She noted her interest as a young girl in Srimavo Bandaranayake becoming the first woman prime minister in the world. She also thanked the Tamil society for inviting her and said that it kindled in her an interest in Sri Lanka. She said she was born in Ireland and can fully understand the persecution of minorities. She said most New Zealanders are sympathetic to the plight of Tamil people. However, the event on September 11th has created greater awareness for security in New Zealand. She said National party will support the general thrust of the anti-terrorism bill. She said the bill makes it clear who a ‘terrorist’ is. She added that there will always be some subjective aspect to that.

Adhitya Kashiyap, of United future, asked if anyone has seriously attempted to understand why someone commits a ‘terrorist’ act. He said New Zealand should not follow the Band-Aid policy of the USA without understanding the causes. Those who are branded ‘terrorist’ by the western world are ‘heroes’ to two thirds of the world population, whose issues are not covered by the mass media, he said. He said Tamil people have struggled for 50 years without a forum to highlight their plight. India went in to resolve it without understanding and burnt its fingers.

During the panel discussion, Matt Robson commented that there is no proposal to proscribe LTTE in New Zealand given that a peace process is underway. Marie Hasler also said that there is no reason why LTTE will be regarded as a ‘terrorist’ in New Zealand, particularly with the peace process going on. Keith Locke commented that even if LTTE is not proscribed immediately there will be continuing pressure on the New Zealand government to proscribe LTTE because the government is expected to take advice from the security council. USA and UK who are permanent members of the Security Council have proscribed LTTE. On the financing of liberation struggles Matt Robson added that he will not be afraid to support organisations in New Zealand that are supporting liberations struggling for peoples rights even if some other organisations that they are supporting are branded as ‘terrorist organisations’, because New Zealand will always support the right of people here to support such struggles.

The chairperson Malathy Naguleswaran asked the New Zealand people to take serious note of the outcome of the December 2001 election where the Tamil people of Sri Lanka voted unambiguously for a mandate that stated that LTTE is their sole representatives in negotiations with the government. She also asked New Zealand to stand apart from the rest of the western world as they have done with respect to their anti-nuclear position and the South African anti-apartheid position. Then, like the gratitude shown by the South African people, all of Sri Lanka’s people, both Tamils and Sinhalese, will show gratitude to New Zealand for promoting peace she added.

Mail Us up- truth is a pathless land - Home